Presumably after a lot more stuff migrates to HTTP, I'd guess. It'd be a good use-case for a new cache-control directive, mind. I don't think 'cache-control: private' would quite satisfy needs.
Dale Mahalko wrote: > Wait wait, LL is already using squid internally? And I've been asking > for organizational/school/business proxy-caching of SL for years and > I've heard nothing of this? > > At the K-12 public school districts where I work, we are STILL limited > to using 3 megabit for 75 staff and some 200 student computers all at > the same time. Without organizational proxy-caching there's no way SL > will ever work in cash-strapped education classrooms. > > So how long until LL finally implements squid proxy-cache support on > the client side, with Snowglobe and HTTP-texture? > > - Dale Mahalko / Scalar Tardis > > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Tateru Nino <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > RFC2616 doesn't impose any particular restriction, but intermediate > software might. Last I looked, the Lab was using squid to handle... > well, quite a lot of things, including this. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges -- Tateru Nino http://dwellonit.taterunino.net/ _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
