On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 09:39:06AM -0400, Lear Cale wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Robin Cornelius <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The closest this type of security (shared private key) has to working > is when the secret is embedded in security ASICs and even this is not > completely secure. > > Right -- there are really two issues here: > > 1) Is it technically feasible at all?
The short answer is No...
So many times have why been tried to explanined to the "Content
Creators"(*) i sometimes think it's time to requext them needing to
handeld before that cause more damage.
> Until I hear a good answer for item #1, the rest is noise.
There is a good answer on Item #1, some people refuse to accept this
as the answer is nopt what they like to hear. Then they start to find
other variants of item #1 to make an effort to make something:
(*) With content creators here i mean the small vocal group, that could
be exemplified by the once in court case with LL for not inveting
magic.
--
o_ Anders Arnholm,
o/ /\ [email protected]
/|_, \\ http://anders.arnholm.se/
/
`
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
