http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163
--- Comment #21 from Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <[email protected]> 2009-12-15 18:54:49 --- (In reply to comment #20) > I agree with Ceki. > The getEnclosingLogger(..) syntax is quite strange. > > You could always use > LoggerFactory.getLogger(new Object(){}.getClass().getEnclosingClass()); > as you said yourself. Which is the finest example of cut-and-paste template I've seen for long :) I do not fancy the anonymous class trick. I like the class name better, and some day I'll make Eclipse do it for me. Right now I'm happily typing it every time. > > Changing the topic a bit: > Does anyone know enough about annotations to be able to tell me if something > like > > @Logger > private final Logger logger; > > would be able to initialize logger appropriately? I've never written an > annotation myself so I don't know. I looked into this a while back. Basically annotations are metadata, so you need SOMETHING that will do something with it for this to happen. A normal classloader will NOT. I am at the moment trying to use Google Guice - which provides dependency injection - and it has built in support for JUL. http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/BuiltInBindings -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ slf4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev
