http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196
--- Comment #3 from Robert Elliot <rob...@teviotia.co.uk> 2010-08-13 20:25:51 --- It's not actually my decision, but I'd be very surprised if the answer is anything other than "won't fix". SLF4J is a very simple logging interface, with multiple widely diverging implementations; it has no notion of additivity, which is a specifically Log4J implementation detail, so what would log4j-over-slf4j do with the call? All it could do is ignore it, which would presumably have negative knock on effects for the library that cares about a Log4J logger's additivity setting. You could still use SLF4j - just use slf4j-logj12.jar as your implementation so that the ultimate logging implementation is log4j, and don't use slf4j-over-log4j. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ slf4j-dev mailing list slf4j-dev@qos.ch http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev
