Ooops! My mistake! I was only a matter of layout (actually, I was bound to logback). Sorry about it.
Libor On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Libor Jelinek <[email protected]> wrote: > For my current setup it is for buit-in simple logger. > > Also, it may be something bad in my setup. Stay calm. I will try to > investigate it in more detail, and eventually file a bug ideally with > patch. > > Thanks > Libor > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:52 AM, ceki <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> no restrictions. with which binding is this? >> >> >> On 26.09.2012 11:44, Libor Jelinek wrote: >>> >>> Hello all (Ceki), >>> are there some naming restrictions for looger name? >>> >>> I would like to ("POKUSY" is Czech word for "experiments" :-)) >>> LoggerFactory.getLogger("_POKUSY_osgi-over-slf4j_1.0.0.qualifier") >>> >>> but obtained logger is named >>> _1.0.0.qualifier >>> >>> Libor >> >> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Ceki >> http://twitter.com/ceki >> _______________________________________________ >> slf4j-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev _______________________________________________ slf4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev
