Matthew Bishop <Matthew.Bishop <at> elasticpath.com> writes: [snip] > My experience with inject vs. static binding to loggers is mixed, meaning > some people won't, or cannot, > accept the injected approach. We need to have both methods of acquiring > logger instances. > > I have a Guice injection module that I can contribute. I think you have something similar for Spring. > Interested in putting something together as an injection starting point?
Matthew, I agree the first concern should be to keep a clear backwards-compatibility route and that applies to clients using LoggerFactory.getLogger() static calls, as well as to implementation providers expecting a hook on StaticLoggerBinding. Clearly, it means we must keep the whole system. However, it seems reasonably easy and with little side effects to just "cut" the system into its own JAR. It is then up to users to choose whether they want to keep using static binding and drop that support JAR in their classpath, or whether they want to do the wiring using their favorite injection framework (using ILoggerFactory.class as service/injection key). I think that once we have made that cut, we could provide handy bindings for integration with DI frameworks such as the Guice bindings you made. I found the Spring example through a Google search, but I am personally writing such an extension for iPojo, an OSGi component framework. -- Simon > _______________________________________________ slf4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev
