http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176
--- Comment #24 from James R. Perkins <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 101 --> http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/attachment.cgi?id=101&action=edit Patch for thread-safety issues during binding The patch uses the same test previously attached. The implementation is slightly different than the other patch. I don't think the reentrancy checking should be necessary, but I don't know if other bindings actually invoke this method again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ slf4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-dev
