Sure no probs, http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187
Regards, Dave On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Ceki Gülcü <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello David, > > Please enter a bug report so that the correction can be made. > > On 30/06/2010 1:56 PM, David Savage wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm working on integrating slf4j 1.6 in an osgi environment and have >> hit a stumbling block using the log4j-over-slf4j legacy support. >> >> The bundle exports the org.apache.log4j package using the default >> version (0.0.0) this causes problems when client code tries to use >> these packages if they declare an explicit import version range - in >> our case the imports are: >> >> Import-Package: org.apache.log4j;version=[1.2.14,1.3) >> >> 0.0.0 is not in the range 1.2.14->1.3 >> >> In my environment I've rebuilt the log4j-over-slf4j bundle with the >> following manifest which fixes the problem: >> >> $ cat log4j-over-slf4j/src/main/resources/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF >> Implementation-Title: log4j-over-slf4j >> Bundle-SymbolicName: log4j.over.slf4j >> Bundle-Name: log4j-over-slf4j >> Bundle-Vendor: SLF4J.ORG >> Export-Package: org.apache.log4j;version=1.2.14 >> Import-Package: org.slf4j, org.slf4j.helpers, org.slf4j.spi >> >> However I'm just taking a wild guess that 1.2.14 is the version of the >> log4j api that this bundle provides. Is there any chance that this >> meta data (and other related meta data) could be added to the adapter >> bundles to make life easier for us OSGi folk? ;) >> >> Regards, >> >> Dave > > _______________________________________________ > slf4j-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user > _______________________________________________ slf4j-user mailing list [email protected] http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
