On 15.05.2012 09:10, Alexey Romanov wrote:
Why doesn't Logger have overloads of logging methods which take both
Object arguments to replace {} and an exception? I.e.
Logger.error(String, Object, Throwable), Logger.error(String, Object,
Object, Throwable), Logger.error(String, Object[], Throwable)? It
seems to me there should be no problem with overload resolution.
Hi Alexey,
Because it would entail the addition of 10 new methods to the Logger
interface. Moreover, as of SLF4J 1.6.0, if the last argument is an
exception it is treated as such. See also [1].
HTH,
[1] http://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#paramException
Yours, Alexey Romanov
--
Ceki
http://twitter.com/#!/ceki
_______________________________________________
slf4j-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
