Hmmm, interesting point. Would you be open to the possible extension of the existing formatter? (*Chris*)
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Ceki Gülcü <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > It is not possible to configure a different MessageFormatter than the > default. The current API does not and will not support changing the > MessageFormatter because allowing for such changes would open the door for > errors. For example, if your application A depends on library L, and F1 and > F2 are two formatting conventions, then if A uses format F1 and L uses F2, > then any choice of formatting convention would cause errors either in A or > in L. > > Merry Christmas and happy holidays, > > > On 12/26/2013 6:52 AM, Chris Pratt wrote: > >> Ceki, >> I thought I had read that with the latest SLF4j it was possible to >> configure a different MessageFormatter than the default. But, looking >> at the code, It doesn't appear possible. What would I need to do to get >> a code modification to SLF4j reviewed and possibly approved? Is it as >> simple as providing a GitHub Pull Request to you or is there something I >> would need to sign before that would be allowed? Thanks. >> (*Chris*) >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> slf4j-user mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user >> >> _______________________________________________ > slf4j-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user >
_______________________________________________ slf4j-user mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
