While slf4j is just a facade, there's a growing group of features in various projects that put configuration at the slf4j api level (both at startup and runtime), not at the slf4j implementation level.
Am I wrong in assuming that the stated scope of this was for this proposal to have slf4j api level ability? - Joakim On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 8:42 AM Ceki Gülcü <c...@qos.ch> wrote: > > > On 1/27/2022 2:55 PM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote: > > I like it. > > > > OFF is definitely useful, and should be there. > > > > ALL on the other hand seems redundant. > > Just setting the most noisy level (TRACE in slf4j terms) would be the > > equivalent end result. > > Unless I am forgetting something or getting forgetful, SLF4J does not > allow users to set levels. > > > - Joakim > > -- > Ceki Gülcü > > Sponsoring SLF4J/logback/reload4j at https://github.com/sponsors/qos-ch > _______________________________________________ > slf4j-user mailing list > slf4j-user@qos.ch > http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
_______________________________________________ slf4j-user mailing list slf4j-user@qos.ch http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
