Hi, I'd prefer to move old 1.0.x release to archive.
regards, Martin > -----Original Message----- > From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Freitag, 13. Februar 2004 10:11 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Jakarta Project Management Committee List; Slide > Developers Mailing > List > Subject: Re: [VOTE]: Slide 2.0b1 release and website update > > > Folks! > > I want to roll out a beta release for Slide 2.0 and we were > discussing > if we should have it mirrored or not. It is the first release > for over 2 > years now and thus we expect many downloads, even though I > can not tell > what that means in numbers. > > If we decide to have it at http://www.apache.org/dist/ shall > I move the > 1.0.x release to http://archive.apache.org/dist/ in order to avoid > confusion or shall I leave it where it is. > > Thanks in advance for clarifications! > > Cheers, > > Oliver > > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > ref: http://www.apache.org/dev/mirrors.html > > > > "Releases that are not intended for general public consumption > > should be placed on cvs.apache.org. This includes automated > > test builds (cvs.apache.org/builds/) and pre-release versions > > (cvs.apache.org/dist/). Essentially, any release that you do > > not consider ready for prime time" > > > > However, I thought I recalled a rule of thumb that if you > expect more than > > about 600 downloads, put it under the mirror structure. > Any expectation for > > Slide? > > > > In any event, just check with infrastructure@ for guidance. > > > > --- Noel > > > > > > . > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
