Dear Sliders,

I was wondering if someone here did compare the IFS, from Oracle, and Slide.
In fact, both projects seem to have the same goal (content management) and
the same functions (webdav, versioning, ...).
Of course as IFS needs an Oracle database to run it is less open then Slide.
On the other side, as IFS is runing in the database maybe performance are
better than for Slide.

Any comments ???

Thanks for you help.

Guy






--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to