Thanks a lot, James, I am positively interested.

Yours sincerely,
Andrey.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Slide Users Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 4:35 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: "displayname" property usage in Slide 2.0 Release
> Importance: Low
> 
> I worked around this by using a ContentInterceptor that sets 
> the displayname property of a resource every time it is 
> added/moved/etc (the code implements preStoreContent()). It's 
> worked well so far, but basically makes the displayname 
> property useless as a separate property.
> 
> I can post the code if you're interested.
> 
> -James
> 
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/8/2004 1:29:11 PM >>>
> Hi there!
> 
> I'm migrating from Slide 2.0 Beta1 to Slide 2.0 Release and 
> I've come across the same problem Peder Nordvaller and Julian 
> Reschke described 3 months
> ago:
> "When creating a new folder IE creates a folder named "New 
> Folder". I then rename it and it works just fine. But when I 
> refresh the IE window the name "New Folder" reappears instead 
> of the new name."
> (See the full discussion here:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg0
> 5594.html)
> I have one more issue that probably have the same cause: when 
> I save a new file to the Slide store using MacOS's MS Word 
> and then view it using PC WebFolders, I see some strange 
> string instead of the name I entered.
> Actually, it's the value of the "displayname" property... 
> In Slide 2.0 Beta1 the value of "displayname" was always 
> equal to the last portion of the resource URI so this problem 
> never happened.
> I wonder if there's a patch or workaround here, any help 
> would be really appreciated.
> 
> Yours sincerely,
> Andrey Shulinsky.
> 
> PS: by the way, may I ask about people's opinion about Slide 
> 2.1 Milestone 1? I mean, Slide site officially recommends to 
> use Slide 2.0 
> (http://jakarta.apache.org/slide/download.html), but does MS1 
> introduce some new and risky stuff or is it just the improved 
> (bugs fixed, performance
> tuned)) version of the 2.0 Release? Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to