For this solution, maybe instead of setting up hardware specific to this project 
(which would be the ideal solution without a doubt!), for now would it be possible to 
create the testsuite and allow an option to automatically export the results to the 
Slide project itself. The safest, quickest, and most convenient would be the testsuite 
creating a single zip/tar.gz file containing all hardware/version/results/config 
changes/debug code.  Take advantage of the Slide users hardware ;-)

-D


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Warwick Burrows [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 10:45 AM
> To: 'Slide Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: Automated testsuite runs?
> 
> 
> 
> I wish. At this stage I don't have anything to spare. The 
> company hasn't
> even taken the slide-based app I'm developing seriously as yet :-)
> 
> But you know it wouldn't have to be an incredibly resource 
> intensive test.
> Just enough threads to find some race conditions and or lock 
> exposures. This
> can be as few as 10 threads to find the more obvious ones. 
> And really it
> would be more of a regression test to make sure that any new 
> code submitted
> doesn't introduce glaring problems.
> 
> Warwick
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: James Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 9:00 PM
> > To: Slide Users Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: Automated testsuite runs?
> > 
> > 
> > That can be really hardware intensive, though. Especially if you're 
> > talking about putting the clients and server on the same 
> hardware. I 
> > think it's a really good idea and could help improve Slide, 
> > but finding 
> > resources for it could be difficult. Someone would need to 
> volunteer 
> > some hardware, I think. You have anything extra lying around ;).
> > 
> > -James
> > 
> > Warwick Burrows wrote:
> > > Had you guys considered running the automated testsuite in both a 
> > > functional and a high load configuration? The high load 
> > config could 
> > > catch threading problems and other issues the server may 
> meet under 
> > > load? This would simply mean running the testsuite with a 
> > large number 
> > > of threads and iterations configured.
> > > 
> > > Warwick
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >>-----Original Message-----
> > >>From: James Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 10:39 PM
> > >>To: Slide Users Mailing List
> > >>Subject: Re: Automated testsuite runs?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>I've noticed that Maven generates reports for Unit Tests. 
> This would
> > >>seem to indicate that *someone* is doing automated testing. 
> > >>infrastructure@ would probably be a good place to ask. I can 
> > >>poke around 
> > >>there if you like. I've had "set up nightly builds" on my 
> > >>todo list for 
> > >>awhile, and since Stefan volunteered to do all the work I 
> > can try to 
> > >>find him a server ;).
> > >>
> > >>Let me know if I should ask around.
> > >>
> > >>-James
> > >>
> > >>Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>Folks!
> > >>>
> > >>>Most people - including myself, I guess Stefan is the only 
> > lightful 
> > >>>exception - do not let the testsuite run with changes that
> > >>
> > >>appear to be
> > >>
> > >>>minor. However, even small changes can break quite a lot
> > >>
> > >>and it would be
> > >>
> > >>>helpful if we could find the newly introduced bugs as quick as
> > >>>possible... So maybe we could find a way to run automated 
> > >>
> > >>tests every
> > >>
> > >>>night? We would for sure need a server that checks out new
> > >>
> > >>stuff, builds
> > >>
> > >>>it, installs it and finally let's the testsuite run. 
> This would of
> > >>>course require some scripting. Aren't there solutions that 
> > >>
> > >>manage the
> > >>
> > >>>whole procedure? How were they called?
> > >>>
> > >>>What do you people think? Anyone having access to a 
> > suitable server?
> > >>>
> > >>>Oliver
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---------
> > >>
> > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---------
> > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to