Great :) The problem is that WCK has not yet been released with anything stable, but once reported I will try to fix issues as quickly as possble. Please do not hesitate to report anything that looks like a bug to you or what should be improved.
Thanks, Oliver On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 13:16:10 -0500, John Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Much better. Thanks for the quick fix! > > -John > > > > > Oliver Zeigermann wrote: > > OK, I have just committed somthing that should fix it, could you > > please try if it works for you?! > > > > Thanks, > > > > Oliver > > > > > > On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 17:15:08 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>I see, you are right, this has been done with the latest 29th November > >>patch by Stefan. > >> > >>I will fix this ASAP, thanks for reporting :) > >> > >>Oliver > >> > >> > >> > >>On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 10:28:55 -0500, John Rousseau > >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>>I'm new to slide and WebDAV (but not to Java, HTTP, etc.). > >>> > >>>I'm trying to put a WebDAV frontend on our product. WCK seems to be > >>>exactly what I need. > >>> > >>>I'm using HEAD as of 02 Dec 2004. > >>> > >>>I've implemented BasicWebdavStore and I can browse our archive with the > >>>slide webdav client, however when I try to "get" a resource, I get back > >>> an HTML directory listing. > >>> > >>>This is because: > >>> > >>>webdav/method/GetMethod.java:238 finds that the NodeRevisionDescriptor > >>>for my resource has a COLLECTION property. > >>> > >>>This is because: > >>> > >>>slide/simple/store/WebdavStoreAdapter:597 news up a > >>>NodeRevisionDescriptor using a deprecated constructor, which calls the > >>>no-arg ctor which calls initDefaultProperties() which sets the resource > >>>type to a COLLECTION_TYPE. > >>> > >>>So, from the above, I think I understand _what_ is going wrong. What I'm > >>>hoping to hear from the list is _why_. > >>> > >>>Shouldn't the WebdavStoreAdapter call my BasicWebdavStore's isFolder() > >>>and set the resource type appropriately? > >>> > >>>Have I blown my implementation somehow? Did I goof the configuration? Is > >>>this a bug? > >>> > >>>Any help would be appreciated! Thanks for the great tool and the WCK > >>>expecially! It's making my life very easy. > >>> > >>>BTW, I'm having a very hard time groking what I need (and what I don't) > >>>in my Domain.xml. The wiki is a little light on details. Anyone have a > >>>minimalist Domain.xml for WCK? I just want to serve content. I don't > >>>care about authentication right now. > >>> > >>>Thanks! > >>>-John > >>> > >>>--- > >>>John Rousseau > >>>Archivas, Inc. > >>> > >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
