Hi everybody, I know that performance and speed decreases when the folders are huge, but I think if I can implement the webdav protocol directly to my store it will have better performance. There are many initializations done to use slide store, and which I dont need, so I want to safely remove theses intializations and code related to slide store. --- Alessandro Apostoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everybody > > > It's easy depending on what your store does. If > you're not doing > > anything 'fancy' - such as what is given in the > regular demo where > > every user starts out in a given root location, > etc... > > > > I think if you stray too much from what domain.xml > and webdav spec > > defines, it's too easy to break Slide. I could be > wrong but if all you > > need is access to > > webdav servlet for a system that does not itself > implement webdav spec > > file organization- it may be easier to implement > it yourself. WCK > > seems easy (actually it is if you play by Slide's > rules and lay > > everything out in a simple file structure) but it > gets a lot more > > complicated and you have to know more about Slide > if you want to > > change/customize some things. From my very limited > understanding, > > Slide is not very flexible (yet?) (maybe because > it so strongly > > adheres to the webdav spec - that is doesn't > expect anyone using it > > not to do the same with their app). Slide is easy > to break if you > > don't play exactly by its rules - which is > somewhat difficult to know > > given that there isn't anyone who knows enough > about the system that > > has time to fully document the details (though > this mailing list helps). > > > > For example, I could be wrong but it's difficult: > > to have users start at a specific 'folder' (which > is virtual - and has > > different contents on a user by user basis) when > they first connect to > > the webdav server, > > to easily give users access to specific files > (which could dymanically > > change everytime) they connect, > > and so on... > > > I'm doing precisely that, my users have multiple > homes and I dinamically > create a tree of virtual folders representing > those homes, the content is dinamic and so are the > users/groups rights > on them, I think that the only drawback you > might have using wck is performance once your > folders get huge as is > often the case. > Just my 2 cents... > > Alex. > > > someone please correct me if I'm wrong > > > > mohamad tarek wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> I have my own store, with my own authentiation, I > just > >> want to use webdav servlet, implement the webdav > >> without using any slide-store functions, is that > possible? > >> > >> > __________________________________________________ > >> Do You Yahoo!? > >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > >> http://mail.yahoo.com > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
