That thread from 25-Jan-2005 is indeed about this same issue. I build from HEAD and tests fail with reference implementation. Well he said it "should" be fixed. hmm... "should" doesn't mean "had" I wonder if patch got lost on the way or something.
John Rousseau wrote:
I thought James Mason submitted a patch for this recently (he sent mail on 24 Jan, copied below) after I reported the same issue. Unfortuantely, I have not yet had a chance to verify it myself.
-John
On 2005-01-24 at 11:17 +0500 James Mason wrote:
> This should be fixed in Slide HEAD now.
Roman D wrote:
Thank you for the patch! that fixed NPE!
My WCK store saves properties and return them exactly as they were set by client.
Still I have litmus failures;
-> running `props':
0. init.................. pass
1. begin................. pass
2. propfind_invalid...... pass
3. propfind_invalid2..... pass
4. propfind_d0........... pass
5. propinit.............. pass
6. propset............... pass
7. propget............... FAIL (No value given for property {http://webdav.org/neon/litmus/}prop9)
8. propextended.......... pass
9. propmove.............. pass
10. propget............... FAIL (No value given for property {http://webdav.org/neon/litmus/}prop9)
11. propdeletes........... pass
12. propget............... FAIL (No value given for property {http://webdav.org/neon/litmus/}prop9)
13. propreplace........... pass
14. propget............... FAIL (No value given for property {http://webdav.org/neon/litmus/}prop9)
15. propnullns............ pass
16. propget............... FAIL (No value given for property {}nonamespace)
17. prophighunicode....... pass
18. propget............... FAIL (No value given for property {http://webdav.org/neon/litmus/}high-unicode)
19. propvalnspace......... pass
20. propwformed........... pass
21. propinit.............. pass
22. propmanyns............ pass
23. propget............... FAIL (No value given for property {kappa}somename)
Is it WCK problem or Is there anything I can do to improve situation?
Is WCK supposed to be litmus-proof?
Thanks.
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Thanks for reporting. Of course no test should cause a NullPointerException. I have committed a patch that adapts WCK to the new PropertyName version that should fix this issue.
Oliver
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 05:07:08 +0200, Roman D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have store with WCK, and when testing with litmus I get a
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.slide.common.PropertyName.getPropertyName(PropertyName.java:121)
at
org.apache.slide.content.NodeProperty.<init>(NodeProperty.java:117)
at
org.apache.slide.simple.store.WebdavStoreAdapter$TransactionId.retrieveRevisionDescriptor(WebdavStoreAdapter.java:625)
It has something to do with namespaces, and it happens when litmus test for setting property "http://something/something/";, value "something"
Storing of properties implemented same as reference WebdavFileStore, so I am wondering,
Is WCK WebDAV-compliant according to litmus test? Should WCK-based implementation be expected to pass all litmus tests ?
Thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
