Hi, On Feb 18, 2008 6:01 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I think that "jcr base" is a little bit to generic. > What about naming it "jackrabbit-base" as it is the base for the > jackrabbit-client and jackrabbit-server modules?... Agreed, or jackrabbit-commons maybe? -Bertrand
