Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 20.02.2008, 17:32 +0100 schrieb Lars Trieloff: > After thinking a bit about it, I think that neither renaming server- > side scripts to ecma nor having a designated /apps or /libs path nor > having an executable bit would solve my problem in the light of > Bunkai, where you actually want to edit the scripts you are going to > execute later. > > I do not really understand yet when scripts are supposed to be > executed on request and where this behavior is desired (it feels a bit > like PHP to me)
We can just as easy switch this off again. Actually it is marked as a TODO in the servlet resolver to still decide how to proceed. Regards Felix > > regards, > > Lars > > On 20.02.2008, at 15:37, Felix Meschberger wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 20.02.2008, 14:33 +0100 schrieb Lars Trieloff: > >> I was unable to get the JSON representation (curl -u admin:admin > >> http://localhost:8888/dojo/dojo/AdapterRegistry.js.1.json) > >> because Sling tries to execute the JS script then and gives me > >> following error message: > >> > >> org.mozilla.javascript.EcmaError: ReferenceError: "dojo" is not > >> defined. (/dojo/dojo/AdapterRegistry.js#1) ... and so on. > > > > Yes, we execute a resource, which adapts to Servlet, if the request > > has > > an extension. Therefore the request /dojo/dojo/AdapterRegistry.js (no > > extension) is not executed by the given request is executed (extension > > json). > > > > This collision between streaming the script and executing the script > > is > > an issue only with .js files AFAIK. The reason for this is, that the > > JavaScript ScriptEngineFactory is registered for .js and .esp files. > > > > We might fix this by using .ecma instead of .js for server-side > > JavaScript files. > > > > WDYT ? > > > >> > >> So my question is how do I define subtrees that are not executable, > >> even if they contain a script. I think microsling originally had a > >> convention that only scripts in /scripts were actually executable, > >> but > >> the current code deviates from this convention. > > > > This depends from where you are looking from: I would say, microsling > > devaiated from Sling in that respect ;-) > > > > Regards > > Felix > > > > -- > Lars Trieloff > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://weblogs.goshaky.com/weblogs/lars >
