Hi, Absolute agree, I think now would be the moment to implements this change.
Regards, Juanjo On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > ...Rethinking the whole issue, I'm not sure if it's really worth > changing the > > behaviour as this would mean that all users have to change their paths > for > > scripts.... > > You mean our two users? Just kidding, but I'm not sure if we have that > many users at the moment. > > > ... So which real problems are we trying to fix?... > > 1) Most scripts, being GET scripts for html content in a typical app, > are named html.esp (or html.whatever depending on the language). That > can be confusing when editing them, and lead to errors, developer > usability suffers. > > 2) Having all scripts that relate to a given resource type in the same > folder, as opposed to split into several folders as is currently the > case, makes it easier to have an overview of what's going on. > > I agree that it's late to make such a change, but the benefits seem > worth the effort for me, and now (i.e. before we add more examples and > documentation) seems to be the right time. > > -Bertrand >
