[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12605530#action_12605530
]
Jukka Zitting commented on SLING-540:
-------------------------------------
AFAIK all the code in Dojo should be OK for us to distribute, we just need to
label it accordingly. It should be OK to cover this by including a generic
"look there for specific licenses and notices" reference in the LICENSE and
NOTICE files. But it would be good to review the stuff that's in there before
publishing this bundle as a binary.
> Clarify extensions/dojo licensing
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-540
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-540
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Extensions
> Reporter: Jukka Zitting
> Priority: Minor
>
> The extensions/dojo component comes with the LICENSE_dojo file (which should
> be merged to LICENSE) and a "The Dojo Foundation" notice, but I'm not sure if
> that covers everything included.
> The LICENSE_dojo mentions: "Some modules may not be the copyright of the Dojo
> Foundation. These modules contain explicit declarations of copyright in both
> the LICENSE files in the directories in which they reside and in the code
> itself. No external contributions are allowed under licenses which are
> fundamentally incompatible with the AFL or BSD licenses that Dojo is
> distributed under", so there shouldn't be any surprises but we may need to
> add something like a generic "see the individual files for applicable
> copyright and license information" clause to our LICENSE and NOTICE files.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
