[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664141#action_12664141
 ] 

Juan Jose Vazquez Delgado commented on SLING-830:
-------------------------------------------------

Works for me (rev. 734729), windows vista 64. java 1.5.0_14

> Startup failure when after a full build of Sling.
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-830
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-830
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: General
>    Affects Versions: Launchpad Base 2.0.4, Launchpad App 4, Launchpad Webapp 4
>            Reporter: Felix Meschberger
>            Assignee: Felix Meschberger
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: Launchpad Base 2.0.4, Launchpad App 4, Launchpad Webapp 4
>
>
> When doing a full build of Sling from the root of the trunk using the Maven 
> Reactor, the final launchpad/app JAR file cannot be started because a JAR is 
> said to not be verifiable (see also [1]):
> sling/launchpad/app/target# java -jar 
> org.apache.sling.launchpad.app-5-incubator-SNAPSHOT.jar -c sling -f -
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.SecurityException: Invalid signature 
> file digest for Manifest main attributes
>     at 
> sun.security.util.SignatureFileVerifier.processImpl(SignatureFileVerifier.java:221)
>     at 
> sun.security.util.SignatureFileVerifier.process(SignatureFileVerifier.java:176)
>     at java.util.jar.JarVerifier.processEntry(JarVerifier.java:277)
>     at java.util.jar.JarVerifier.update(JarVerifier.java:188)
>     at java.util.jar.JarFile.initializeVerifier(JarFile.java:321)
>     at java.util.jar.JarFile.getInputStream(JarFile.java:386)
>     at sun.misc.URLClassPath$JarLoader$2.getInputStream(URLClassPath.java:689)
>     at sun.misc.Resource.cachedInputStream(Resource.java:59)
>     at sun.misc.Resource.getByteBuffer(Resource.java:154)
>     at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:249)
>     at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:56)
>     at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:195)
>     at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>     at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188)
>     at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307)
>     at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301)
>     at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:252)
>     at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:320)
> Could not find the main class: org.apache.sling.launcher.app.main.Main. 
> Program will exit.
> It seems that on a full build, the signature files from the Eclipse 
> HttpService Bridge are included, which cause the JAR class loader to try to 
> verify the jar file, which of course fails. The files are META-INF/ECLIPSE.SF 
> and META-INF/ECLIPSE.RSA. If these files are not in the final JAR, it starts 
> up flawlessly.
> When doing a single-module build of the the launchpad/base first and then 
> launchpad/app, the JAR file is correctly created without these Eclipse 
> signature files. So it looks like this problem is related to the reactor 
> build. In addition, the launchpad/base build is defined to ignore the 
> META-INF folders of the included libraries. This does not seem to be obeyed 
> in the reactor build case.
> So, I assume this is related to the maven-dependency-plugin being used to 
> glue the launchpad/base library together is not the correct version, since 
> multiple versions are used throughout the build process and there is no 
> managed version number in the parent pom.
> Adding the maven-dependency-plugin to the parent pom's pluginManagement with 
> version 2.0 and removing all explicit version references actually fixes this 
> problem and the resulting jar starts correctly, even after a reactor build.
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/4fxvcvm4jhiveb7l

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to