Hi, On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@gmail.com> wrote: > ...So the request "GET /some/path.print.html" could be handled by any of > the following scripts > > path.GET.jsp > GET.jsp > PathGET.java > path.html.esp...
That's really only interesting for the java case, right? So why not limit this to .java scripts? IIRC the resolver goes through available scripts and assigns priority weights to them, it might not be too hard to let the script engines contribute to these weights (haven't looked in detail though). I fully agree about making our .java "script" names nicer, either we support them or we don't, and the current support with weird script names is not pretty. -Bertrand
