Hi all, just a question - would it be better to test RC2 one week just intern, before it is anounced on the website?
and then perhaps a bug page for RC2 in doc, just to avoid double posts and answers in the forum? I can test Geode, Via C3, Via Eden (Christophe did you change something?), PII, PIII with intel grafic, Centrino with Radeon + Tridend grafik, Athlon XP with NV7050 something else - the English Website http://www.slitaz.org/en still links to http://www.slitaz.org/en/doc/ but it should be http://doc.slitaz.org/en:start Thomas Am Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:54:08 +0100 schrieb Christophe Lincoln <[email protected]>: > > > Hi Christophe, > > Hi Tom, > > > I was stupid - xorg-server-Xfbdev exists .... > > Nope you note stupide :-) > > xorg-server-Xfbdev = A TinyX autonomous server who need no driver and > have small dependencies but limited feature (SliTaz 1.0, 2.0 was > using A TinyX server called Xvesa in 3.0 we have a flavor of. But > Xorg dropped it and since TinyX server Xfbdev work on any hardware > wich support framebuffer) > > xorg-xf86-video-fbdev = The framebuffer driver for Xorg server wich I > never tested and who is not yet in SliTaz. Guess it is a generic drive > like the vesa one. > > > ciao > > > > Thomas > > > - Christophe > -- SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
