*Sigh* This is like comparing Ubuntu to Arch and equally productive. DSL had Debian as an back-end and it's developers didn't have to lift a finger to fix half the issues we have to. Modern these days is using a properly configured xorg that automatically generates the configuration every boot and a system that uses udev exclusively (and left HAL behind). 99% of the libraries DSL used has bloated a big and probably tripped in size by now. The playing field isn't even anymore. This is half why I get so pissed off when people compare SliTaz with other distros. I think the only fair comparison would be TinyCore and then only barely. Puppy had years to adapt to the proper way of doing things, it's creator is pretty clued up and with it's current large user/developer base it's pretty up to date. Arch has the same advantage and all the others are based on some pretty distros. We don't have that luxury and we're still learning.
So please instead of comparing or complaining, rather use that energy into helping us conform the standards and teaching us how to use xorg, the linux kernel and udev effectively. -- SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
