I think the old way maintains backwards compatibility and is simpler + faster. My vote is to stick with the old one.
Christian On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Aleksej Bobylev <[email protected]>wrote: > Last days I see the sources of (relatively) new /lib/libtaz.sh base > library. > Even I added function unboldify() to it. > Libtaz have several functions to format text: boldify, separator, > newline, colorize, indent. > But I think that we need only one function to format text. Why? > Because we can write one composite message via one function. Like here: > ==1== > Before: > boldify "$(gettext 'Usage:')"; gettext 'man [section] command' > After: > emsg "$(gettext '<b>Usage:</b> man [section] command')" > ==2== > Before: > newline > boldify "$(gettext 'Tazpkg SHell')" > separator > After: > emsg "<n><b>$(gettext 'Tazpkg SHell')</b><->" > > What you think about next one try? > > Attached files: > /home/hg/emsg/emsg: function emsg() > /home/hg/emsg/test: test suite for emsg() > > Original libtaz.sh on the SliTaz Mercurial repos: > http://hg.slitaz.org/slitaz-base-files/file/tip/rootfs/lib/libtaz.sh > > -- > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/ > >
