On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:20:27AM +1000, Philip Yarra wrote:
> tables differentiated only by the case of the name (e.g. ACCOUNT, account and
> aCcOuNt) in the same database and schema. I reckon that's a corner-case, but
> I'm willing to revise my opinion if someone can provide me with a real-life
> example.
It makes no difference if it's a corner case. Slony is supposed to
provide generic support, which means we _have_ to support this.
> Well yeah, this is my point: I'm a software developer, I'm used to things
> blowing up in my face. It still took me by surprise, and cost me time
> figuring out why it occurred. I suspect people less-accustomed to PostgreSQL
> might take longer to figure it out, or worse yet, give up on using PostgreSQL
> and Slony. I want to remove obstacles to adoption.
Right. It appears to me that this is a documentation issue.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do sir?
--attr. John Maynard Keynes
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
