On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 08:21:49AM -0500, Jan Wieck wrote:
>
> I just wonder what the value in that MOVE SET "on corruption" is. We can
There isn't one, which is the point. If the database is really
corrupted, you're hosed. You _can_ do a MOVE SET though for maybe 5
databases where you have more-strict SLAs than the rest of them, when
you can tell the hardware is failing. Imagine you have a 2-disk RAID that
just lost one disk. 5 of the databases have a lot of traffic, while
the other 45 are basically read-only back ends for blogs. Move the
5: it's safer, and in the worst case (the other disk fails), you have
to do failover for the node, but you won't have lost much. There are
several scenarios I can imagine like this.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant-
garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism.
--Brad Holland
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
