On November 1, 2005 02:36 pm, Philippe Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, as far a I'm concerned (and I think it would apply to any mass > hosting service), in order to keep flexibility, and scalability, the > best solution would be to keep 100 distinct clusters, but directed by a > minimum of slon processes...
What exactly are you trying to achieve with this setup? If the answer is near-real-time backups, then you should probably consider PITR instead of Slony. It just seems unlikely to me that web hosting customers are going to grok the intricacies of having Slony added to their database environments. -- In a world where the citizens of most developed nations have half their incomes wrested from them by the state (slaves only paid about a quarter, effectively), how widely supported do you think the idea of "freedom" really is? - Russ Nelson
pgpNLrLSOHDUV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
