On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 12:00:32PM +0100, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> IMHO slony should behave as a unicode application, i.e. use UTF8 client
> encoding for all database connections. This will have pgsql apply
> conversions transparently, because most server encodings can convert
> happily from and to UTF8.
This seems like an unreasonable imposition on people who aren't
using UTF8. What if the application can't speak UTF8, but needs
multibyte? That's a serious issue in parts of Japan, where there are
some rather fraught politics around Unicode.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is above all style through which power defers to reason.
--J. Robert Oppenheimer
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general