On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 04:32:12AM +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Ühel kenal päeval, R, 2006-01-20 kell 16:47, kirjutas Andrew Sullivan:
>
> > But would I use Slony as the _only_ wheel in my HA machine? Not on a
> > bet.
>
> Wise choice, as currently Slony *IS* broken by design (see my last mail
> on the subject). But you only notice this brokenness if you do really a
> lot of transactions, so that indexes using xxid_ops start failing, which
To be strict, that's not broken by design, that's a bug. Nobody
intended that there be such a limit on transactions.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The year's penultimate month" is not in truth a good way of saying
November.
--H.W. Fowler
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
