On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 01:15:41PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> In the case where I'm looking to need this, the application is creating
> tables on the fly, and no two tables necessarily have the same schema ...
> don't ask, not my design, just having to support it :(
If you check the original design discussions, you'll see that this
case was _explicitly_ excluded from support. Jan regards such code,
I seem to recall, as self-modifying, and regards it as an evil to be
stamped out, not something to be propped up with replication. (He
has rather strong views on this, in my experience. I can't say I
feel so strongly about it, but I have to agree with him that it's not
something to be encouraged.)
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If they don't do anything, we don't need their acronym.
--Josh Hamilton, on the US FEMA
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
