On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 02:51:22PM +0000, Christopher Browne wrote: > As far as lower bound goes, I don't see too much problem there. The > value is used to determine how long the cleanup thread sleeps between > invocations. The shortest that could *possibly* fall to is zero, in > which case it would run continually.
Wouldn't that result in the thread continuously polling the database, presenting an unreasonable load? I guess in some cases if you're paranoid about database size and don't care about performance that might be ok, but ISTM there should at least be a warning in the docs. Another concern is that running in that mode could cause an XID rollover relatively quickly. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
