Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 10:13:05PM +0000, Christopher Browne wrote: > >> Having heard no particularly negative reports about testing thus far, >> Jan and I are hoping to prepare a release candidate for 1.2 tomorrow. >> >> At this point, we have a pretty lean set of supported platforms; all we >> have heard about, thus far are: >> >> 1. Linux - Debian/unstable >> 2. FreeBSD 5.3 >> 3. AIX 5.3 >> 4. Windows >> > > I'll try and setup Slony on FBSD 6.x tonight or tomorrow. > That would be super. >> I'm updating documentation now; Jan pointed out to me that I had missed >> observing that slon has been restructured to not keel over at a whim, >> which changes how watchdogging need be handled. I'll be checking in a >> fair number of changes on that tomorrow. >> >> I wish I was seeing a larger set of platforms tested; hopefully there >> will be more reports before we release 1.2.0... >> > > Any thought of setting up an equivalent to the buildfarm for Slony? >
It has come up, mostly on IRC... I suppose there's a certain amount of merit to getting Slony-I to compile on a bunch of platforms. The trouble is that you really need to run some tests, too, and it's remarkably challenging to write good automatable tests. _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
