Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 08:36:01PM +0000, Christopher Browne wrote: > >> 2. SELECT * from some_table; >> >> ...now has an additional column with a pretty funky name. Potentially, >> the new column might not forcibly be "at the end", where apps might be >> prone to ignore it... >> > > Which is why SELECT * isn't good code... > It's worth observing that Slony-I didn't create the problem; it merely exposed it up front.
If an application that used "SELECT *" had been pointed to a subscriber, unpredictable results would occur... _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
