On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 02:46:12PM -0700, elein wrote:
> The point of what I could write is that it is from the dba on the street
> perpective, rather than the slony task perspective. You are working, as you
FWIW, I think this is a capital idea. I had to set up a replica
recently, after not doing it for a longish period of time (ok, ok,
the refresh rates on my memory are bad. So sue me), and I have to
say that if you don't already know more or less exactly what you're
doing with Slony, the documents as they exist are really confusing.
I also agree with Elein that this is mostly a perspective problem:
all the data is there, but it's not laid out in a way you need it for
naive administration. It's easier to extrapolate from the tutorial,
in fact, and I don't think that's a good thing.
> I'd like to hear concerns about too many documentation branches as
> well as real life problems that people have run into when setting
> up and administering slony.
Well, if we had another branch after this I'd squawk, but this is
fine.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The year's penultimate month" is not in truth a good way of saying
November.
--H.W. Fowler
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
