> I've commited a fix for this. Looks like the direct manipulation of GUC > vars > is not possible under win32, instead we must use the GUC helper functions.
I have a question as to the performance implications of this... This change means that we now call set_config_option() not once, but twice, for each row that gets replicated. Do we have any idea of what negative impact that has on performance? I don't at all mind assigning an integer value in there; I'm quite concerned that the GUC function calls may be considerably more expensive... _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
