On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 04:11:19PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> If your conclusion is that pgFoundry is borked and we need to replace it
> with something else *in general*, then let's replace it.
I think the conclusion is twofold:
1. pgFoundry is not sustainable in the long run, because of the
problems Chris raised.
2. We need something _right now_, because it's plain that gborg
isn't a reasonable holding pattern any more.
If it weren't for (2), we could decide on something else to replace
pgFoundry, &c. But as things stand, my bet is that will take ages.
In addition, there are all the people who've moved from gborg to
pgfoundry: it seems sort of unfair to them to make them do _another_
move.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The plural of anecdote is not data.
--Roger Brinner
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
