On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 09:19:26AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > to me that what we need to do is nail down -- whether for Slony or
> > for the PostgreSQL project more generally, if people like -- what
> > sort of service we would _like_, and how we are willing to compromise and
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> What I'm pointing out is that that's the wrong way to think about
> it. 100% of deficiencies with pgFoundry are curable by an
> application of sysadmin time.
You don't know that, and neither does anyone else, because we haven't
got a list of requirements. So let's get that, and then we can
discuss what we ought to do.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The year's penultimate month" is not in truth a good way of saying
November.
--H.W. Fowler
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
