I think that Andrew Sullivan's comment about first putting together a list of what the project is looking for before going further makes solid sense. I suggest that before going ahead with this discussion, it would be a good idea to at least get an idea of what is on that list.
Drew On 9/19/06, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I am starting a new thread as the old one, has gotten seriously > off-topic and should move to pgsql-www. > > The long in short is that CMD is willing to host Slony. CMD is also > willing to provide any reasonable features that the Slony project would > like. > > Most of the active members I have communicated with seem o.k. with that. > > So can we have some discussion on CMD actually hosting the project, > specifically from those who have a problem with CMD hosting the project? > > Sincerely, > > Joshua D. Drake > > -- > > === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === > Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 > Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 > http://www.commandprompt.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Slony1-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general > _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
