On 9/27/06, Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sep 27, 2006, at 12:53 PM, Christopher Browne wrote: > > > That being said, the recent outage of gBorg represents something where > > using a distributed SCM (Git, Darcs, Mercurial, ...) would have turned > > the outage into a minor inconvenience. That is so because > > individuals' > > My understanding is that the svk software which layers on top of svn > provides such a distributed repository system, but I am not that > familiar with it. If that's the only problem we're solving by moving > from CVS, then I don't think it is worth the trouble. >
svk does indeed use svn as a backend. Using svn for the server and svk when you need it on the client for off-line or distributed dev is a pretty decent combo. Most of the time I prefer to use just svn though. -bob _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
