Hi Marco, You have 4 databases on each server. Is this absolutely necessary? Unless you have issues you're specifically solving for with this configuration, perhaps you would be better off using a single database with perhaps schema to differentiate between what used to be in separate databases. This would allow you to reduce the number of slons you're running since you could manage all four data sets via a single instance of slony.
Drew On 9/27/06, Marco Aurelio V. da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear´s, > > I have this scenary: > > Server A: Bd1 Server B: Bd2 Server C: Bd3 Server D: Bd4 > > Server A > Bd1 = Master > Bd2 = Slave > Bd3 = Slave > Bd4 = Slave > > Sever B > Bd1 = Slave > Bd2 = Master > Bd3 = Slave > Bd4 = Slave > > Server C > Bd1 = Slave > Bd2 = Slave > Bd3 = Master > Bd4 = Slave > > Server D > Bd1 = Slave > Bd2 = Slave > Bd3 = Slave > Bd4 = Master > > for not having an Internet of high availability in each server, it exists > the necessity of if working in such a way, having one bd to master in each > server and 3 bd´s slave. Slony is ideal for this scene? > > other doubt, > in each server, I execute a process slon to send the data and other to > receive, after to execute the process to receive if the server responsavel > for sending the data will not have executed the process to send it gives an > error message and leaves, which the indicated form to solve this problem? > slon_watchdog? > > Thanks to Advance, > > Marco Aurélio V. da Silva > Prodata Inf. e Cad. Ltda. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _______________________________________________________ > O Yahoo! está de cara nova. Venha conferir! > http://br.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > Slony1-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general > _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
