> On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 12:03:48PM -0800, Jeff Frost wrote: >>> Interesting. This table has never been part of the subscription set, >>> would it >>> have added these catalog manipulations anyway? >> >> Sort of. Likely, something has collided. The general rule is, I >> think, very clear: no DDL at all if you don't do it through EXECUTE >> SCRIPT. > > This was definitely what was needed to drop the table in question. > > Maybe we can add this to the doc or the FAQ? I certainly would not have > thought I needed to use execute script to drop non-replicated tables based > on > the docs in adminguide/ddlchanges.html. Maybe I didn't look hard enough > in > the docs?
You looked hard enough; this scenario is a bit surprising... If we can characterize it a bit better, that would be nice... _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
