Bernd Helmle wrote: > > > On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:47:04 -0500, Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 03:05:00PM +0100, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: >>> well after the latest fixes in CVS they actually work(at least i use >>> them regulary) - and I think it is Bernds intention to take over >>> maintainance and actively fix them ... > > Thats exactly my intention. I'm currently about to clean up the code and > to make them to use at least strict/warning. What we need for this kind > of tools is a reliable framework and regression tests, so that broken > functionality could be detected. I have some ideas already...
I'm also interested to help improve these tools, and expect to have some for it as well. I agree with the approach of getting "use strict/warnings" to work, as well as have some automated tests for the tools. Should I just keep sending patches to this list for nwo, or would direct access to an SCM system be preferable? Mark (a.k.a [EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
