Mark Stosberg wrote: > This post suggested a performance improvement to the initial copy might > appear in 1.2, by removing indexes and re-applying them. > > http://gborg.postgresql.org/pipermail/slony1-general/2005-June/002285.html > >>From reading RELEASE-1.2.0, I didn't see a mention to that effect. Is an > optimization like this in place?
Sorry. I think I found the answer in the FAQ: http://slony1.projects.postgresql.org/slony1-1.2.6/doc/adminguide/faq.html#AEN5936 This appears to have been fixed in 1.1.5. Thanks! Mark _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
