[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:09:07 -0500, Mark Stosberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>>> I really would like continuing to work on that and to share ideas, >>>> Mark, >>>> Maybe we could coordinate efforts? >>> That sounds good. How about sharing the code you have through a source >>> control system? We could perhaps use the established CVS or SVN server, >>> although I have a strong preference for using darcs... I feel more >>> productive with it. However, I'm flexible. >>> >> I think that's a good idea. I'm not tightened to a specific SCM, too. >> However, >> i've don't have access to a public server where a SCM is running at the >> moment. > > I wouldn't have any objections to shifting the "altperl" code to a > separate place, from several perspectives: > > 1. I quite like Darcs, too :-) > > 2. Having others responsible for the release cycle for "altperl" would > remove a burden I am not over-interested in carrying. > > (Albeit one that is typically pretty small.) > > 3. Keeping the "slony1-engine" module down to those things that are > directly replication components would simplify how testing is understood. > > At present, none of the usual tests that take place in verifying that > Slony-I works involve "altperl" components. I'm not keen on complicating > the tests by adding that. Dropping responsibility for *that* is actually > more significant than 2... > > There's my few cents...
Is it possible that the central Slony development server could host darcs-based development? I think it would just need: - ssh accounts for developers - a darcs binary - some web space A web-based darcs repo browser would be optional, but easy to setup. I could help with some of the setup of these things, if that's an issue. Mark _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
