On 2/14/2007 6:49 AM, Bernd Helmle wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:51:39 +0200, Mikko Partio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> >> I'd like to offer my 0.02? regarding this subject: >> >> 1) I think the whole wrap-slonik-with-perl approach is generally wrong >> -- what I would really like to see is that slonik itself would be >> modified so that it became more interactive client, like psql. Now I >> don't know anything about how slonik works, and I don't even know if my >> suggestion is feasible, but I think it would be the most simple and >> effective way to control slony. For example, you could have slonc -d >> <clustername> and then execute any commands necessary (I agree with Mark >> Stosberg with the naming issue, slonc is better than slonik). Also slonc >> could have -f switch for files etc. >> > > slonik isn't designed to be an interactive command line shell, and more on > that, > i don't believe slonik's syntax as well (correct me if i'm wrong ;) I don't > see how that would be more user friendly? However, an interactive slonc mode > sounds interesting....
The intention behind slonik was to have a quick and dirty tool that can do the job until some serious toolset is created ... didn't happen yet, but that was the plan anyway. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] # _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
