Sorry for the confusing wording. What I meant was that, on the Master, under subscriptions, the table is there (along with a subscription to the slave node).
On the Slave node, there is a subscription also but also to the Slave node (to itself?) and no table present. So I was just wondering if it had something to do with my replication script or possibly something with the communication between the two machines -----Original Message----- From: Kurt Overberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:15 PM To: Benezra, Eric Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] Question about replication script Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but you should only have to run this script once, generally against the master (I believe is the convention, but I don't think it matters). I'm not sure what you mean when you say the table appears on the slave, then you later say that the table does not appear on the slave? Hope this helps... /kurt _______________________________________________ Slony1-general mailing list [email protected] http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
