On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 05:52:36PM +0400, Dmitry Koterov wrote:
> But please, detalize how Slony uses LISTEN/NOTIFY and why, if it uses
> LISTEN/NOTIFY, it still generates poll queries instead of sitting and
> waiting for a NOTIFY event. I cannot find this information in the Slony
> documentation.
Which version are you using? In the past, we found that too much
reliance on LISTEN/NOTIFY tended to cause bloat in pg_listener and a
different set of problems. So 1.2.x reduced that cost, at the
expense of additional polls. Those polls should be cheap. I'm
mostly worried about. . .
> possible without bombing the master by polling queries. E.g. lag 0.2s is
> allowed, but 5 polling queries per second is too much.
. . .this. Why is it too much? Anyway, if that's too much, then why
not set the lag to the level you'd find acceptable?
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary
and imaginative work need not end up well.
--Dennis Ritchie
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general